Researcher  ·  Winston-Salem, NC

Researching how people
navigate complex,
high-stakes systems.

I'm a mixed-methods researcher with 15+ years of experience turning qualitative and quantitative evidence into decisions. I study how people move through complex systems and where those systems break down. My work translates findings into clear direction for the teams and stakeholders who act on them. Although my subject-matter expertise is in criminal justice, my methods and approach travel across any high-stakes, human-centered domain.

Chase Montagnet

I'm a researcher with over 15 years of experience in mixed-methods research, evaluation, and project leadership. My work centers on understanding how people make decisions and navigate complex systems, then translating what I learn into evidence that improves policy, practice, and design. I pair rigorous qualitative methods, in-depth interviewing, focus groups, and thematic analysis, with quantitative approaches including survey research, program evaluation, and quasi-experimental designs.

My subject-matter expertise is in criminal justice, where I've studied mass incarceration, reentry, restrictive housing, diversion programs, and probation reform. Across every project, my focus is the same: listen closely to the people inside a system, connect their experience to the data, collaborate across teams and stakeholders, and turn findings into decisions that hold up.

I have held positions at RTI International, the Vera Institute of Justice, the Fortune Society, and Rutgers University's School of Criminal Justice, where I have led and contributed to projects funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the National Institute of Justice, and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, among others.

In the classroom, I design discussion-based, applied courses that help students connect data, theory, and lived experience — fostering critical thinking, collaboration, and analytical depth.

Education

PhD, Criminal Justice (with distinction)

Rutgers University  ·  2023

MS, Criminal Justice Policy (with merit)

London School of Economics  ·  2012

BS, Psychology (summa cum laude)

College of Charleston  ·  2009

Methods & expertise

Quantitative analysis (Stata) Qualitative interviewing Mixed methods Difference-in-differences Randomized controlled trials Systematic reviews NVivo · Dedoose Program evaluation Policy analysis

Affiliations

American Society of Criminology
Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences
Law and Society Association

Research

My work examines crime, criminal justice reform, and the collateral consequences of incarceration — using mixed methods to inform evidence-based policy and practice.

Peer-reviewed journal articles

2025

'Losing My Religion'?: Religiosity in the aftermath of incarceration

With Sara Wakefield  ·  Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 11(1), 415–440

2025

The effect of pre-release treatment with injectable naltrexone on criminal justice and substance use outcomes

With C.C. Strange, J.M. Hyatt, K. Powell, & D.D. Langleben  ·  Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1–18

2024

Prosecutor-Led Diversion Unveiled: Lessons and Insights From Implementing Project Reset in Two Jurisdictions

With V. Embry, K. Bechtel, C. Inkpen, & A. Walker  ·  RTI Press

2024

"Worst experience in my life": Conditions of confinement in incarcerated settings during the COVID-19 pandemic

With J. Bowling, A. Azari, & C. Berryessa  ·  Criminal Justice Review, 49(2), 268–285

2023

The variable association between religiosity and delinquency

Crime & Delinquency, 69(10), 2046–2072

Books & book chapters

2022

Impact of incarceration on community public safety and public health

With T.R. Clear  ·  In R. Greifinger (Ed.), Public Health Behind Bars (2nd ed.) · Springer

2019

Parental criminal justice involvement

With S. Wakefield  ·  In J.M. Eddy & J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Eds.), Handbook on Children with Incarcerated Parents (2nd ed.) · Springer

Technical reports

2025

Reforming Probation: System Actors' Perspectives of Georgia Senate Bill 105

With E. Burtch, C. Kery, K. Bechtel, C. Inkpen, & P. Lattimore  ·  SSRN

2024

A Systematic Review of Bureau of Justice Assistance FY14 to FY18 Second Chance Act Evaluations

With R.M. Labrecque et al.  ·  Bureau of Justice Assistance

2021

Restrictive housing practices in America's jails

With J. Pierce & D. Pitts  ·  Vera Institute of Justice

2021

People in jail and prison in spring 2021

With J. Kang-Brown & J. Heiss  ·  Vera Institute of Justice

2021

People in jail and prison in 2020

With J. Kang-Brown & J. Heiss  ·  Vera Institute of Justice

2020

People in prison in 2019

With J. Kang-Brown, E. Schattner-Elmaleh, & O. Hinds  ·  Vera Institute of Justice

2020

Second Chance Pell: A snapshot of the first three years

With R. Delaney  ·  Vera Institute of Justice

2014

Model Programs Guides implementation guides

With R. Stephenson et al.  ·  Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

Case Studies

Selected case studies showing how I move from ambiguity to clarity: research on how people navigate high-stakes systems, and how findings changed real decisions.

When the system fails under pressure

Healthcare & institutional systems

Qualitative research on carceral experiences during COVID-19

53 interviews  ·  Northeastern U.S.  ·  Published in Criminal Justice Review  ·  Presented to the New Jersey Sentencing and Disposition Commission

53 participants interviewed
18 facilities represented
3 critical failure points identified

Research question

When COVID-19 hit U.S. correctional facilities in 2020, administrators implemented rapid lockdowns to contain the virus. No one had systematically asked the people living inside those systems what was actually happening to them, or whether the design of the response was working. This research filled that gap.

Approach

I co-led a study of 53 semi-structured interviews with individuals recently released from state prisons, county jails, and halfway houses. Our team developed the interview guide collaboratively, piloting and iterating before full deployment, and analyzed the data using a constant comparative approach in NVivo, with interrater reliability testing across one-third of the sample.

Key findings

(1) The lockdown design created solitary-like conditions for the entire general population, exceeding what is legally permitted even in disciplinary solitary confinement, lasting months rather than days. (2) Communication infrastructure collapsed under load: the 15-minute out-of-cell window forced impossible choices between showering and calling family. (3) Trust eroded rapidly, producing the opposite of the intended outcome: participants hid symptoms to avoid quarantine, undermining containment.

Impact

Findings were presented to the New Jersey Sentencing and Disposition Commission and at national conferences, contributing to an evidence base used to push for humane quarantine protocols distinguishing medical isolation from punitive confinement.

When policy design meets operational reality

Policy systems & workflow research

Stakeholder research on Georgia's probation reform system

Focus groups + interviews  ·  4 circuits across Georgia  ·  RTI International  ·  Presented to Georgia Department of Corrections & state policymakers

4 circuits studied
3 user groups interviewed
3 design failure points found

Research question

Georgia has the largest probation population in the U.S. Senate Bill 105 created pathways to early probation termination after 3 years, projected to save $34M annually. The people actually running the system, probation officers, supervisors, and judges, had not yet been asked how implementation was going. I co-led qualitative research to understand the gap between legislative intent and operational reality.

Approach

Working with RTI International and the Georgia Department of Community Supervision, our team designed semi-structured interview guides for three user groups and ran focus groups across four circuits, selected using administrative data on petition approval rates and backlog levels.

Key findings

(1) The workflow created new burdens that offset intended efficiency gains. (2) A contact failure silently blocked eligible people: once individuals moved to unsupervised probation, officers lost the ability to reach them, so hearing notices went undelivered and petitions were denied for "failure to appear." (3) Judges restored discretion through workarounds, denying petitions for legally unsupported reasons and rewriting future sentences to preserve control.

Impact

Findings were presented to the Georgia Department of Corrections and state policymakers, informing recommendations to streamline the petition workflow and align judicial practice with legislative intent.

Contact

I'm happy to discuss research, potential collaborations, or questions about my work. The best way to reach me is by email.